“Who’s in Charge of the English Language” is
an article from The Exchange. In the
article, the authors, Casey Miller and Kate Swift strongly emphasizes on the
necessity of the cautious and prudent attitudes when writing a gendered terminology.
Miller and Smith begin their article with the main purpose of their writing: “In
order to encourage the use of language that is free of gender bias, it’s
obviously necessary to get authors to recognize gender bias in their writing”. Stating
the thesis statement in the first sentence of the article might be seen to
simplistic and tedious beginning; however, it gives clue to the audience and reinforces
the subject and the authors’ view for the entire article. Shortly after the
introductory paragraphs, Miller and Smith write about the first exigence, “female-negative-trivial”,
which is a linguistic syndrome that considers “feminine” words as negative and
trivial, whereas “masculine” words as positive and important. To illustrate
this syndrome clearer to the audience, Miller and Smith give an example of a
pair of words related to gender words (“womanly” and “manly”) and its
definitions from the dictionary. On the second exigence, “The Slippery Slope”,
Miller and Smith use logos and ethos as means of persuasion to convey their message
better to the audience. To explain the meaning of “the slippery slope”, Miller
and Smith appeal to Douglas Hofstadter’s ethos in his book, Metamagical Themas. The idea of “the
slippery slope” is simply that because common gender word and the masculine
word are equal, the feminine word is no longer used. Giving a reasonable example
that falls under the idea of “the slippery slope”, such as the word actress,
which became archaic, Miller and Smith also appeal to logos to show the
audience how this idea affects our everyday life. For the third exigence, “Resistance
to Change and the Problem of Precision”, Miller and Smith appeals to all three
types of appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos. Miller and Smith use ethos and
logos, when telling the anecdotes of Alexander Gil and Lord Chesterfield rejecting
to revise the problem of precision of the gender related terms. Miller and
Smith also rely on pathos of Lynn White Jr.’s writing “The penetration of this
habit of language…implies that personality is really a male attribute, and that
women are a human subspecies….It would be a miracle if a girl-baby,…could
escape some unverbalized wound to her self-respect.” This quote from White not
only made the audience feel sympathy and compassion for the little girl, but
also made the audience recognize how essential this issue and the invisible
effect are. Overall Miller and Smith fully achieved their purpose by focusing
on their argument with rational examples and logic.
No comments:
Post a Comment